Friday, February 22, 2008
In Other News No One Could Have Predicted...
by Ken Houghton
So the next time Condi talks about an "administrative error," we know what she means.
The Administration "failed to inform" the Poodle's Government of its extralegal activities:
[Mr. Miliband] had to make a humiliating apology to the [House of] Commons after it emerged that the US failed to tell British officials that two CIA rendition flights carrying suspected terrorists landed on the island of Diego Garcia in 2002. Six years on, one of the suspects is still being held by the US at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba. The other has been released.
Mr Miliband denied there was a deliberate cover-up and said he believed the US had acted "in good faith". However, Gordon Brown, attending an EU summit in Brussels, expressed his "disappointment" and said Washington's failure to disclose the flights earlier was "a very serious issue".
"The US has expressed regret that it did not admit at the time to these renditions through Diego Garcia," he added. "We have to assure ourselves these procedures will never happen again."
So the next time Condi talks about an "administrative error," we know what she means.
Labels: Tortured Logic
Monday, July 23, 2007
Shorter Stanley Fish
by Tom Bozzo
At the very bottom of the column, the Nutty Perfesser — in contrast to his previous vagueness with respect to atheists and evolution — assures everyone that his affection for Thomas's opinion is not Swiftian satire or a pomo mind game. Thanks for clearing that up, Stanley, but did we really need to see directly into that corner of your mind?
But as a lack-of-self-awareness bonus, Fish offers this among potshots taken at various commenters (*) to the original column:
(*) Some of whom make elementary mistakes like assuming there may be no limits to free speech rights.
My columns would go over better with the Washington Times readership.(Times Select link, a column responding to readers who gave Fish what-for after a column praising Clarence Thomas's opinion that students have no free speech rights.)
At the very bottom of the column, the Nutty Perfesser — in contrast to his previous vagueness with respect to atheists and evolution — assures everyone that his affection for Thomas's opinion is not Swiftian satire or a pomo mind game. Thanks for clearing that up, Stanley, but did we really need to see directly into that corner of your mind?
But as a lack-of-self-awareness bonus, Fish offers this among potshots taken at various commenters (*) to the original column:
Krista Kerber believes that my columns are themselves “a perfect illustration of 1st amendment rights.” No, they are an example of rights granted, not possessed. The New York Times can always decline to print what I write, although if you are reading this, it hasn’t done so yet.Hope springs eternal (though we appreciate the source of blogging material, Times Select editors). But is our Perfesser reading? She said,
[F]or Fish to hold this opinion and express it is a perfect illustration of 1st amendment rights.Ms. Kerber doesn't claim that Fish or anyone has a right to expression at nytimes.com. The only fair reading of the comment's plain language is that what Fish has is a right to express himself whether in major media, at stanleyfish.blogspot.com, or handing out flyers on the Florida International University campus. Kerber 1, Fish 0.
(*) Some of whom make elementary mistakes like assuming there may be no limits to free speech rights.
Labels: Current Events, SCOTUS, Tortured Logic
Monday, June 18, 2007
Dep't. of Declining Standards in Public Intellectualism
by Tom Bozzo
(*) If I needed 10,000 words written about nothing, Fish would be the first guy I'd call. Boy, that guy can blather.
Much (*) shorter Stanley Fish (behind the Times Select wall for the betterment of society):
If I elide the fundamental differences between science and religion, I can show that prominent atheist scientists (and one, uh, lovable lush) reason just as circularly as the religious!
(*) If I needed 10,000 words written about nothing, Fish would be the first guy I'd call. Boy, that guy can blather.
Labels: Atheism, Religion, Science, Tortured Logic
