Saturday, September 09, 2006
"Relatively Minimal Resources"?
by Ken Houghton
And, of course, not a note about one reason the Party may not have given Lieberman much cash (though the DSCC did endorse him): that the other side did.
Adam Nagourney proves once again that anything Karl Rove says will appear in one of his articles in the New York Times:
The difference is that there was no serious Republican challenger in the Connecticut Senate race, so the Democratic Party invested relatively minimal resources into helping Mr. Lieberman.It's nice to know what the NYT thinks of Bill Clinton, Barbara Boxer, Evan Bayh, Dan Inouye, Christopher Dodd, and the others who prostrated themselves for Kissable Joe.
And, of course, not a note about one reason the Party may not have given Lieberman much cash (though the DSCC did endorse him): that the other side did.
